SIT120留学生代做、代写CSS，JavaScript编程、代写CSS/JavaScript设计

日期：2019-09-15 10:24

SIT120 - Assignment 2

Responsive Web App: Implementation and Demonstration

Worth: 40% of your grade (30% project, 10% presentation)

Due Week 10, Friday 11:00 pm (Firm Deadline)

On Campus Students: Demonstration in person (Week 11 Practical)

Introduction

In this assignment you will demonstrate your understanding of the coding concepts and skills developed throughout

this trimester in a creative context. Using robust Vue platform, you will use HTML, CSS and JavaScript to create a

responsive web application. You are free to design and think of imaginative behaviours and actions for the

components in your aquarium that satisfy the requirements below in a creative manner.

As an individual, your project should demonstrate the use of multiple components in a larger system of both

autonomous and interactive elements. The purpose and format of your project is up to you. For example, you may

choose to focus on a realistic simulation, a game-like experience, a virtual toy, a digital performance, etc. The unit staff

will be happy to hear your ideas and provide feedback.

Tasks

You may work in a group helping each other, however, you should be based on Assignment 1 Proposal and develop

the web application. You are free to improve or modify from this plan during development. Using your Project

Proposal as a guide, you should apply coding using Vue framework and components system to your components in

order to demonstrate a range of coding concepts in a creative manner. All must be included in your project.

Additionally, the following effective coding practices should be demonstrated by your implementation:

The way in which your web satisfies each of these requirements is up to your design. Your submission of the

assignment must be presented as a single zip archive.

Submission

Written Report

An accompanying written report (maximum 5 pages, may be shorter) should explain your implementation, design

and reasoning behind your code and system, include the following information:

1. Overall description of design challenges and system.

2. Explanation of how each of the above listed coding concept requirements have been fulfilled in a creative

manner (screenshots of blueprints, diagrams may also be useful here!).

Oral Presentation

During your practical in Week 11 you will present an oral presentation which includes the following information:

? Short summary of the project goals including target audience.

? Demonstration of the functional project.

? Discussion of the process you took to implementing the features (e.g., how did you translate your ideas into

the functional result? Did you use user stories, UX/UI, create asset lists, etc).

Coding Practises Requirement

Documentation and Basics Effective commenting inside codes to allow easy understanding of the

purpose of different aspects of your code. Efficient use of some of the

following basic ideas.

? Computed Properties and Watchers

? Class and Style Bindings

? Conditional Rendering

? List Rendering

? Event Handling

? Form Input Bindings

? Components Basics

Components in depth ? Component Registration

? Props

? Custom Events

? Slots

? Dynamic & Async Components

? Handling Edge Cases

Transitions and Animations

Reusability & Composition

Tooling and Scaling Up

? Enter/Leave & List Transitions

? State Transitions

? Mixins

? Custom Directives

? Render Functions & JSX

? Plugins

? Filters

? Single File Components

? Unit Testing

? TypeScript Support

? Production Deployment

? Routing

? State Management

? Highlights of key features and how the coding concepts you have learned were applied to these.

? Discussion of the major obstacles and challenges encountered during the course of this project and how you

solved them or made changes. Be honest – coding is challenging and your approach to problem solving and

demonstration of how you have learned from this are very important!

A powerpoint presentation or visual aid is recommended, and should be submitted with your project.

Submission

One must submit the following files to the Assignment 2 link prior to the due date and time. Your submission must

include:

1. Written report as a HTML file.

2. Project in a .zip archive. Make sure to zip the entire project directory (i.e., the folder containing the project

file and all other folders and contents contained within).

3. Powerpoint presentation of your oral presentation visual aid (cloud students: voice over presentation).

Marking Rubric for Assignment 2

Project & Written Report Rubric (30%)

CRITERIA FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCTION

<2.5 POINTS 2.5 POINTS 3 POINTS 3.5 POINTS 4-5 POINTS

CODING CONCEPTS (45 points)

Rubrics on right apply to the

requirements for each coding

concept below.

Not implemented or may

not fulfill the coding

concept requirements in its

implementation. May not

be applied in a functional

manner or contains serious

issues.

Satisfies coding concept

requirements in a basic

manner that is functional

within the project. May

have minor issues or lack

thorough integration with

the rest of the system. May

not go beyond what has

already been

demonstrated in class.

Satisfies coding concept

requirements in a simple

manner that is functional

within the project. Could use

some more thorough

demonstration or better

integration with the rest of the

project. May not go beyond

what has already been

demonstrated in class.

Satisfies coding concept

requirements effectively with

creative or interesting

functionality. Used effectively

as a part of the larger system

with logical implementation.

Evidence of implementation

beyond what has been

demonstrated in class.

Exceeds coding concept

requirements effectively

and/or demonstrates highly

creative or interesting

functionality. Sophisticated

integration demonstrates

thorough understanding of the

concept. Clear evidence of

functionality beyond what has

been demonstrated in class.

Functions

Variables

Loops

State change

Component creation

Handling user inputs Animation

Reusability

Composition

Scaling Up

CODING PRACTISES (15 points)

Documentation Commenting may be

absent from the project

blueprints, have serious

errors or used ineffectively.

Commenting is present in

project blueprints although

may be very simplistic or

used inconsistently. May

still have some issues for

someone unfamiliar with

the project to understand.

Commenting is present

throughout project blueprints

and provides acceptable

readability of the code for

someone unfamiliar with the

project.

Commenting is present and

thorough throughout project

blueprints. The code is highly

readable for a user unfamiliar

with the project. Consistency

is maintained in labels and

comments.

Commenting is present,

thorough and sophisticated

throughout without

overwhelming the project. The

code is very easily readable for

a user unfamiliar with the

project. Consistency is

maintained in labels and

comments.

Components and Functions Components for functions

and variables may appear

random, inconsistent or

incorrectly named. May use

default labels. Blueprints

may be very messy or

difficult to read.

Components for functions

and variables present with

some consistency issues or

some left at default.

Generally understandable

after examination.

Blueprints may not be very

Components for functions and

variables present. May still not

be as effective as possible in

choice of naming or may not

be consistent. Generally

indicate purpose. Blueprints

are generally neat and tidy.

Components for functions and

variables present with valid

and appropriate naming

throughout. Generally

consistent names that indicate

purpose. Blueprints are neat

and readable.

Components for functions and

variables present with highly

relevant naming that clearly

communicates purpose.

Consistency maintained

throughout. Blueprints are

neat or require close

examination to read.

formatted with care to be neat

and highly readable.

Structure Code may be very

inefficient in structure or

have numerous repetitious,

unfinished or broken

elements.

Code is generally

structured appropriately

but may have some

unfinished elements or

unnecessary repetition of

elements that could be

made modular as

functions.

Code is structured

appropriately and makes use

of functions to modularise

some repeated elements.

Code is structured well and

makes good use of functions

to avoid repetition.

Code is structured with

sophistication and makes

thorough use of functions to

avoid repetition. Code is highly

modular to allow easy

additions or expansion.

WRITTEN REPORT (20 points)

Content Some or all sections of the

written report may be

missing significant required

content.

All major sections of the

written report are provided

with some omissions or

overly simplistic minor

details.

All major sections of the

written report are provided

but may be lacking some

minor details or contain minor

errors.

All sections and required

contents of the written report

are provided. Some minor

inconsistencies in detail.

All sections and required

contents of the written report

are provided without

omission.

Coding concept explanations Missing or largely

unfinished.

Most coding concept

implementations may be

explained at a basic level.

May not demonstrate

thorough thought or

consideration.

All coding concept

implementations explained,

but may be somewhat basic or

not demonstrate thorough

thought or consideration.

All coding concept

implementations explained

with demonstrated of clear

thought and planning.

All coding concept

implementations explained

with thorough demonstration

of thought, planning and

creative choices.

Supporting diagrams and charts May be largely or

completely absent, or have

major issues.

Supporting diagrams or

charts included but may be

somewhat simplistic or not

used effectively.

Supporting diagrams and

charts are included and

provide some additional

insights into the coding.

Supporting diagrams and

charts are included that

effectively demonstrate the

code and choices made.

Supporting materials are

referred to within the written

portions of the report.

Detailed supporting diagrams

and charts are included that

very effectively demonstrate

the code and choices made.

Supporting materials are all

referred to within the written

portions of the report.

Presentation May have numerous and

significant spelling,

grammatical or formatting

errors.

Some spelling, grammatical

or formatting errors

throughout. Additional

proof-reading is required.

Some minor spelling,

grammatical or formatting

errors throughout. Some

additional proof-reading is

required.

Very few minor spelling,

grammatical or formatting

errors throughout.

Presentation is professional

and polished.

No notable spelling,

grammatical or formatting

errors. Presentation is

thoroughly professional and

polished.

OTHER FACTORS (10 points)

Polish Project may have serious

polish issues. May appear

unfinished, rushed or

contain serious cohesion

issues.

Project is generally

cohesive but lacking some

polish. May not appear to

fully represent a singular

work due to some

inconsistencies or have

parts that don’t fit

together effectively.

Project is generally cohesive

with satisfactory polish and

general lack of inconsistencies.

Makes an effective functional

whole and most parts fit

together well.

Project is cohesive with

excellent polish and lack of

inconsistencies. Makes an

effective functional whole.

Project is thoroughly cohesive

with excellent polish and lack

of inconsistencies. Makes an

effective, fully functional

whole greater than the sum of

its parts.

Creativity & Purpose Does not demonstrate

creativity or expand upon

the base concept of a

Demonstrates some

elements of creativity,

although some may not be

Demonstrates creativity in

some aspects of the project

and expands upon the base

Demonstrates thorough

creativity in most aspects of

the project and clearly

Demonstrates exceptional

creativity in most aspects of

the project and expertly

(Functions, variables, loops, state

changes, components, user inputs,

reusability etc)

responsive web. May not

be fit for identified target

audience.

fully realised or fit for

purpose.

concept of a responsive web.

Design is appropriate for the

target audience.

expands upon the base

concept of a responsive web

by taking it in a more creative

direction. Design is effective

for the target audience.

expands upon the base

concept of a responsive web

by taking it in a highly creative

direction as a new product.

Design is deeply integrated

with the target audience and

purpose.

OVERALL TOTAL

(max: 90 points, converted to 30%)

<45 points 45 to 53 points 54 to 62 points 63 to 71 points 72 to 90 points

Oral Presentation Rubric (10%)

FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCTION

0-4 POINTS 5 POINTS 6 POINTS 7 POINTS 8-10 POINTS

Summary and key features Missing or with significant

omissions in description of

the project and coding

features.

Project and key features

explained but may be

missing information such

as target audience and

purpose.

Project and key features

explained. May have minor

omissions or could be made

clearer.

Project and key features

explained concisely with clear

identification of purpose and

target audience.

Project and key features

explained concisely with clear

links between purpose,

features and the target

audience.

Demonstration of project May not demonstrate

project or may not be

functional.

Project is demonstrated

but may omit some

features or have some

minor issues.

Project is demonstrated and

shows the major features.

Project is demonstrated with

shows the major features with

a clear explanation of each.

Project is demonstrated and

shows all major features with

an effective explanation of

each that demonstrates a

thorough understanding of the

systems.

Discussion of development process May not discuss

development process or

may be overly simplistic.

Development process

discussed but may be

lacking detail or not clearly

identify purpose or goals.

Development process

discussed with identification of

purpose and goals. Some

additional detail or clarity

would be helpful.

Development process

discussed with detail including

clear identification of the

purpose and goals.

Development process

discussed in detail in terms of

purpose and goals with insight

and demonstration of

learning.

Discussion of obstacles and

challenges

May not identify or discuss

obstacles or challenges.

Obstacles and challenges

identified but may lack

detail or not clearly explain

how these were overcome.

Obstacles and challenges

identified with simple

explanation of how these were

overcome.

Obstacles and challenges

identified with clear

explanation of how these were

overcome and the learning

that occurred.

Obstacles and challenges

identified with thorough

explanation of how these were

overcome, the decisions and

the learning that occurred.

Communication Presentation may be clearly

unrehearsed or stilted. May

be missing visual aids.

Presentation includes

visual aids but may be

somewhat stilted or

unprepared.

Presentation makes good use

of visual aids. May have some

minor issues with flow or clear

communication.

Presentation makes very

effective use of visual aids and

appears polished and

rehearsed.

Presentations makes excellent

use of visual aids to support

discussion. Communication is

clear, rehearsed and

professional.

OVERALL TOTAL

(max: 25 points, converted to 10%)

<12.5 points 12.5 to 14.5 points 15 to 17 points 17.5 to 19.5 points 20 to 25 points