代写MGT201A、Java/Python编程设计代做

日期：2025-07-18 09:49

MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 1 of 6

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF

Subject Code and Title MGT201A – Project Management

Assessment Task Consultative Report

Individual/Group Individual or Group

Length 2,000 words (or equivalent)

Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful

completion of the task below include:

a) Analyse PM principles and performance domains.

b) Interpret the collaborative role and functions of the project

manager, team and stakeholders.

c) Justify relevant PM methodologies for selected projects.

Submission 12-week duration:

Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 8 (Week 8)

6-week duration:

Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 8 (Week 4)

Weighting 40%

Total Marks 100 marks

Assessment Task

This assessment builds upon the foundational knowledge and skills developed in Assessment 1,

where you selected a project. You will now expand your initial analysis by preparing a

comprehensive consultative report that critically evaluates project selection, planning, and work

strategies within the context of project management.

Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Context

Effective project management is a critical skill in today's dynamic business environment.

Organisations must select and manage projects strategically to maximize efficiency, minimize risks,

and deliver value. This consultative report assessment challenges you to apply project management

theories, particularly the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) framework v7, to

analyse project selection, planning, and execution.

MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 2 of 6

You will critically evaluate how project methodologies such as Agile and Waterfall influence project

outcomes, applying structured project planning techniques to develop a robust project management

plan. The assessment also emphasises stakeholder engagement, risk management, and resource

allocation, helping you gain practical, real-world project management skills that align with industry

standards.

By completing this assessment, you will deepen your ability to think strategically, manage project

constraints, and apply project management frameworks in diverse contexts. Whether undertaken

individually or as a group, the report serves as a practical demonstration of project selection and

planning expertise, reinforcing critical skills required for professional project management roles.

Instructions

In this report, you are required to apply key frameworks from the PMBOK v7 to the selected project.

The report should demonstrate a clear understanding of project selection criteria, stakeholder

engagement, planning constraints, risk management, and delivery methodologies, while integrating

PMBOK terminology and processes throughout.

Your group must select from one of the project scenarios provided to you in Assessment 1. You may

work on the same project you selected in Assessment 1, using this as a chance to deepen your

analysis.

Note: This assessment can be completed either individually or in groups of up to four members. If

completed in a group, all members must contribute equally, and a peer evaluation must be

conducted.

The Consultative Report should be structured as follows:

1. Introduction (Approx. 150 words)

Brief overview of the selected project.

Purpose of the report.

2. Project Selection and Strategic Alignment (Approx. 400 words)

Explanation of how the project aligns with business goals and stakeholder needs.

Consideration of key project financial and non-financial selection criteria including:

feasibility, cost-benefit analysis, business strategic drivers, and/or SWOT analysis.

3. Project Scope and Planning (Approx. 300 words)

Clearly define project scope (In-Scope and Out-of-Scope elements).

Identify key project constraints (time, cost, resources, risk, quality) as per PMBOK's

Principles and Performance Domains.

Incorporate a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and milestone definition. Include

assumptions and dependencies.

4. Methodology and Delivery Approach (Approx. 400 words)

Comparison of Agile and Waterfall methodologies in relation to the project.

MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 3 of 6

Overview of key project phases and execution strategies, using PMBOK's development,

planning, work, delivery and measurement performance domains.

5. Stakeholder Engagement and Communication (Approx. 300 words)

Identification of key stakeholders and their roles, using PMBOK stakeholder engagement

techniques.

Development of a Stakeholder Communication Plan aligned with PMBOK

communication principles.

Strategies for managing stakeholder expectations and feedback loops.

6. Risk and Resource Management (Approx. 300 words)

Identification of potential project risks and mitigation strategies, applying PMBOK risk

management processes.

? Resource planning and allocation for people management

? Budget considerations and cost estimation techniques using PMBOK cost management

guidelines.

7. Conclusion and Recommendations (Approx. 150 words)

? Summary of key findings.

? Reflection on professional learnings from the assessment process.

Referencing

It is essential that you use current APA style for citing and referencing the sources that you use.

Please see more information on citing and referencing guidelines on the Academic Success webpage.

Assessment Support

For a range of additional resources and support to help you complete your assessment, please

consult the Study Support page on the Student Hub.

Academic Integrity

All students are responsible for ensuring that their submitted work is original, adheres to academic

writing standards outlined in the Torrens University Academic Writing Guide, and is appropriately

referenced according to the guidelines provided in the Torrens University APA Referencing Guide.

Students need to have read and be aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity

Policy, Academic Integrity Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. For more

information, please refer to the Academic Integrity guidelines and the Torrens University Library.

Students must also keep all required evidence in making an assessment; a copy of all submitted

material and any assessment drafts.

MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief Page 4 of 6

Generative AI

Please refer to the Torrens University Library for guidance on the use of Generative AI. Please speak

to your learning facilitator regarding the use of GenAI tools in your assessments.

Submission Instructions

Submit this task via Assessments > Briefs & Submissions in the main navigation menu in MGT201A –

Project Management. Please name your file using the following format:

o SubjectCode_Surname_FirstNameInitial_AssessmentNumber

e.g. MGT201A _Jones_S_Assessment 2.docx

Your marked assessment can be viewed in MyLearn.

Assessment Due Dates and Late Penalties

Assessments may be submitted on or before the due date. Late penalties apply for assessments that

are submitted after the due date.

Refer to:

Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework (HE) and ELICOS

Torrens University | Think Education

Assessment Special Consideration Guidelines for Students (HE Coursework)

Torrens University | Think Education

Student Hub for Assessment Extension Information.

Special Consideration

To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment task or exam due to

unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher

Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed

Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your learning facilitator.

MGT201A_Assessment_2_Brief